Topic: Property law – “ The High Court of Australia’s decision in Mabo v of Queensland (No. 2) (1992) was a radical rejection of the Common Law’s previous attitude to the rights of indigenous people.” Discuss. This case involves an important piece of legislation involving the rights and land claims of indigenous peoples in Australia, historically and systematically marginalized by a legal system drawn from Australia’s colonial past under the British. By way of brief background to the case, the case had arisen as a result of an action brought against the government of Queensland, Australia by five Meriam Islanders (from the Murray Islands in the Torres Strait) to assail the Queensland Amendment Act of 1982. The action in effect asked the court to resolve a conflict of rights over the islands of Mer, Dauar and Waier in the Torres state — considering that the land had been annexed by the defendant government in 1879, but prior to the annexation by the British, the Meriam people had been living in peace and cultivating the land. The plaintiffs, arguing on long possession, sought a declaration from the Court that they were entitled to possessory title over the land. The defendant government, on the other hand, argued that when England had made Australia part of the Crown’s dominions, the law of England automatically applied and therefore the Crown obtained “ absolute beneficial ownership” of all land in the territory. In a landmark decision and a watershed moment for the land rights struggle of aboriginal peoples in Australia, the court – voting five to one — found in favor of the plaintiffs, and held in very strong words: It is imperative in today’s world that the common law should neither be or be seen to be frozen in an age of racial discrimination… The fiction by which the rights and interests of indigenous inhabitants in land were treated as nonexistent was justified by a policy which has no place in the contemporary law of this country. The Mabo decision, as it had become to be known, signaled a radical shift from the previous paradigm and attitudes held not only by the legal system but by Australian society in general with respect to native titles. Specifically, the Mabo decision heralded a departure from the Terra Nullius (empty lands) doctrine, and in effect reversed the Gove Land Rights Case (Millirpum v. Nabalco Pty Ltd. 17 FLR 141) which involved a 12-year Bauxite mining lease over the Gove Peninsula in Arnhem Land. The Supreme Court of the Northern Territory in 1971 held that native title cannot be recognized in a settled colony, and even if these rights had existed they were extinguished. This is particularly significant because the recognition “ native title” accords more flexibility to the holder, as opposed to English customary rights. The reason is that a native title can be the subject of transfer, via surrender or exchange. Hence, there is greater room for communities asserting the title to evolve and adapt to the changing times and changing conditions. In a sense, the decision has caused a blurring of the lines between private ownership and native title, thus rendering it possible for these two property regimes to co-exist. Further, while the Mabo decision did not go so far as completely dismantle the status of Australia as “ settled colony”, it interrogated the idea that the fact of settlement ipso facto gave rise to absolute beneficial ownership of all lands to England. The decision recognized that contrary to the terra nullius doctrine, which was premised on the colonial idea that prior to annexation the lands were empty/uncivilized/unregulated by any form of law or structure, there was such a thing as native title, which is determined by the nexus to the land of indigenous occupants and their traditional customs. Justices Dean and Gauldron referred to this as: An established entitlement of an identified community, group, or (rarely) an individual to the occupation or use of particular land and that the entitlement be of sufficient significance to establish locally recognized special relationship between the particular community, group, or individual and that land. It is important to note the nuance of the decision, in that it did not claim that the settlement doctrine is completely dissolved. What it did claim is that common law (which was introduced in Australia by virtue of the settlement) could validly accommodate the concept of native title, for as long as the requisites of establishing native title have been proven. The decision also holds that while native title is not automatically abrogated by the act of annexation, native title can be validly unilaterally extinguished by the Crown for as long as the extinguishment was made clearly and without ambiguity by the legislature or the executive, and it is the burden of the party asserting the extinguishment that such had been clearly and unambiguously made. In a sense, therefore, the Mabo doctrine straddles two opposing paradigms: it provides an important layer of protection to aboriginal communities and indigenous peoples while at the same time still affirming the power and legitimacy of the colonial government. It also led to policy and practical questions being remaining unanswered – such as who owns access to the resources, e. g., minerals (a question that the Court would face a decade later.) It is also simplistic to say that before the Mabo decision, communal property rights were completely unrecognized under British common law and that British law lived in monolithic blindness of pre-existing systems. If Australia had been designated as a “ conquered colony”, then the laws of the conquered indigenous tribes would apply. It is because Australia has long been considered a “ settled colony” that the persistent debates arise. However, as far as British common law is concerned, English customary rights had already been recognized and accepted. In fact, the “ rights of common” and “ customary rights” with respect to natural resources are long in place. As early as three hundred years ago, customary rights had already been appreciated by the courts, and this was affirmed in the case of Oxfordshire County Council v. Oxford City Council wherein reference was made to a long line of cases demonstrating that customary rights that have been in place “ since time immemorial”, particularly over village greens and similar areas. To quote from Lord Hoffman at paragraph 5 of the stated case, “ village greens are in theory survivals from the mediaeval past, established by immemorial local customs dating back to before the accession of Richard I in 1189”. Of course, current law (CRA 1965 and CA 2006) require registration of rights over land so that its continued use and enjoyment may be guaranteed. Be that as it may, the Mabo decision is a radical sea-change in Australian jurisprudence. It paved the way for policy changes, most notably the enactment of the “ Native Title Act of 1993” which established the National Native Title Tribunal, with the end in view of creating an arbitration mechanism for the resolution of native title claims. But more importantly, the Mabo decision represents a change in attitudes in how indigenous peoples are viewed and how they should be treated. From previous attitudes of conferring “ new rights” upon them by the magnanimity and grace of the Crown, we now move towards respect and acknowledgement of “ existing rights” – a major shift with important implications for Australian society and even the world. References Allen, CK. (1964) Law in the Making, 7th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mabo v. Queensland (No. 2.) (1992) 175 CLR 1. Millirpum v. Nabalco Pty Ltd. (1971) 17 FLR 141
Related Essay Samples
Capital punishment: an inquiry into policy decisions in the united states research paper examples
The threshold question for states goes to the heart of the role of deterrence in American capital punishment law, and then joins with the problem of cost". Statements of the Problem/Purpose of Capital Punishment The purpose of capital punishment is, ...
Madison man indicted for possessing guns despite prior mental commitment
Summary of the Article The article entitled " Madison Man Indicted for Possessing Guns despite Prior Mental Commitment" was published online in the news portion of the United States Attorney's Office in the Northern District of Alabama. The person being ...
Law enforcement agents and agencies
Law enforcement agents in local, state and federal levels have a common objective which is to enforce the laws passed by the government through legislators and protect citizens. On the other hand, a Federal law enforcement agency is in charge ...
Is scottish independence realistic law constitutional administrative essay
Recent polling numbers state that 70 percent of the Scottish population approve of increased separation from the United Kingdom, feeling that the UK is in some way limiting the success of the Scottish people. The modern movement for Scottish independence ...
Law in a changing society
This paper seeks to discuss the various aspects of the Australian legal system and decide if the processes are keeping up to date with the changes in the society. The Adversarial System The adversarial system in Australia has always left ...
The dangers lurking at home essay sample
We all think of our our homes as the safest place to be, and they should rightly be so. However, there are many dangers of which we should be aware to ensure that our homes are indeed the safest place ...
Ethical decision making in criminal justice
One of the ways in which this event would affect the police officer's operation is through the initiation of a chain of events geared at covering up the past. Therefore, it is justifiable to lie in the questionnaire.
The second amendment essay sample
The Second Amendment or Amendment II of the Constitution of the United States of America is the part of the Bill of Rights that protects and recognizes the right to keep and bear arms from violation by the federal government. ...
Court assignment
In proceedings of a family court that I attended, during the first hearing, the court made directions with regard to filing of the evidence, and statement of the case, with respective deadlines for each filling. The judge determined that the ...
Deontological ethics and teleological (utilitarian) ethics
Deontology however judges actions by aims that drive them and is based on the principles of responsibility. The two theories therefore differ in the principles that while utilitarianism is based on consequences of actions, deontology is based on responsibility and ...
The main purpose of the national rifle association (nra)
The main purpose of the National Rifle Association [1] is to " promote and encourage rifle shooting on a scientific basis".[2] Along with this key initiative, the NRA has other promoting sights that harbor the same motto such as the ...
Example of preventing systems intrusions report
Malware affects computer systems in a number of ways by turning off automatic updates and disabling exceptions in the Windows firewall. Antivirus software, for example, are usually used to detect and remove viruses in computer systems.
Criminal justice: the right job for you assignment
According to a 2008 study by the Pew Center on the States, the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with one in 100 Americans under the supervision of the criminal Justice system. The role of criminal ...
Internet article analysis essay sample
The law enforcement of the police departments must have the minimum training that require by the State of Virginia and in compliance with applicable crime reporting. Virginia needs these funding to help the police department and state police protect the ...
Sample essay on social security
Social security is the actions programs by the government that are aimed at improving the welfare of the society by offering guarantees the full access to resources like food and shelter to the population. If action is not taken to ...
Electronic crime term paper
According to Internet Crime Complaint Center, in 2008 the number of electronic crimes in the USA has increased from 207 to 275 thousand, and resulted in a total loss of 264. A research conducted by Dataquest Inc in March 2003 ...
Labor standard and social legislation
The four-fold test of determining the existence of employer-employee relationship is applicable to PH and the security guards, to wit: * The manner of selection and employment of the security guards It was PH who chose the guards to be ...
Cyber law: its implementation in nepal
The verdict of the Jury defied the powers of the king and sent the whole of the country into partying. The characteristic feature of the Common Law System such as precedent, the role of the judge, the role of the ...
Free essay about edward snowden and ethics
Readily accessible information over the internet and the curiosity to know more has instigated the sense of accountability in people which has led to many whistle blowers being born. It is apparent that Snowden breached the law and the Code ...
Unit6
LexisNexis Dictionary: Respondeat Superior: The doctrine under which liability is imposed upon an employer for the acts of his employees committed in the course and scope of their employment. Welch, the Court found that vicarious liability is limited to injuries ...
First part (state witness: jake) critical thinking
Second Part JUDGE: The Defense may call in its next witness DEFENSE: I would like to call Juliet Osmond to the stand Juliet Osmond enters the box and is sworn in- DEFENSE: Please state your name and profession. DEFENSE: Based ...
Article review on the social development issues in somalia
The source of the article is the OCHA website: www.unocha.org Summarily, the article addresses the condition of Somalia with regard to the migrations of people due to internal displacements and refugee departures. It is as well observable that according to ...
Lincoln-douglas
This paper will focus on three main aspects of the analysis, namely the causes of the debates, the content of the debates, and the results of the debates. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates during the Illinois ...
The reliability of eye witness testimonies criminology essay
The use of eye-witness testimony is often a primary source of evidence used in the judicial system around the world. Therefore, distraction of witness is also a factor to be taken count on in the unreliability of eye-witness testimony.
The role of the supreme court law constitutional administrative essay
Legislature develop the law that is necessary for the constitution to carried out the task and the executive use the powers that gave by the legislature to govern the country while the judiciary interpreting statutes and applying the case law. ...